With Awaab's Law in force, social landlords must react more swiftly, but more than that: they should also prevent problems from emerging in the first place. Achieving that shift – from firefighting to foresight – depends on reliable data and truly centralised information management.
Until now, many housing associations have handled complaints in isolation: a tenant reports mould, a contractor applies a quick fix, and the case is closed. The same issue then resurfaces again a few months later. It's a reactive approach that fails to spot wider patterns across properties, delays structural repairs that could permanently solve the problem, and leaves tenants frustrated by repeat visits. Ultimately, it leads to poorer health outcomes, breaches of regulation, and reputational damage – and, as Awaab's case tragically showed, can cost lives.
Proactive housing safety requires a shift of housing associations, from waiting for complaints to anticipating risks. That means applying predictive risk assessments that consider factors such as building age, construction materials, and complaint history, so issues can be identified before tenants are affected. It also involves carrying out regular inspections of high-risk dwellings, even when no new reports have been filed, to detect early warning signs. In addition, housing associations should adopt strategic maintenance planning that prioritises preventative upgrades over costly emergency fixes. Finally, empowering tenants through education on ventilation, timely reporting, and basic home-care practices helps create healthier living environments and strengthens collaboration between landlords and residents.
Only with real-time, portfolio-wide visibility can associations turn theory into practice. Spreadsheets and siloed databases simply cannot deliver the instant insight needed to stay ahead of emerging hazards.
A modern EIM solution brings together every piece of relevant information – property specifications (such as build date, materials and insulation levels), tenant complaints, maintenance logs, inspection findings, and records of all communications and remedial actions. Having these data in one place enables landlords to run comprehensive risk analyses, identify clusters of issues (for example, three mould-complaints in the same block), automatate alerts for overdue inspections, and monitor performance via live KPI dashboards tracking response times and resolution rates.
The financial and operational benefits of a proactive, information-driven approach are clear. Preventative maintenance generally costs far less than emergency repairs called out at short notice, while early problem detection helps to reduce the risk of expensive legal claims or investigations by the Housing Ombudsman. Coordinating contractor visits in a more strategic way also lowers travel and administrative expenses, creating efficiencies across the organisation. On top of that, fewer repeat complaints free up customer-service teams, allowing them to focus on new requests instead of repeatedly addressing the same issues.
Engaging tenants as active partners boosts the above mentioned benefits even more. When residents can log issues via an online portal – uploading photos, tracking progress, and even rating completed jobs – they feel heard and respected. This transparent feedback loop reduces escalation, strengthens communication, and helps rebuild trust over time.
To make proactive safety the norm, housing associations need commitment from the top, investment in integrated technology, and a comprehensive change-management programme so every member of staff embraces the new system. Clear service-level agreements and escalation protocols ensure that urgent cases always reach senior leadership without delay. In a post-Awaab world, centralised information management is not an optional upgrade but the very engine of safer, more dignified social housing.